User avatar
By Ryan
#494744
Stinky Pete wrote:He has the first half. He just needs something with a verb in it. And a subject.

This is what is know as casual writing...but if you want to pick on grammar I'll assume you have no arguments. Other than racist.
User avatar
By Ryan
#494745
Stinky Pete wrote:He has the first half. He just needs something with a verb in it. And a subject.

Yeah and this is perfect grammar...idiot
User avatar
By Ryan
#494747
Stinky Pete wrote:
Ryan wrote:For the record the Tea Party was about ejecting leftist and progressive ideology.


:lol: We all (including you) know what it was about.

I'll take racism for $500 Alex.

Every comment that is made by a conservative.
...what is dog whistle ?

You people are completely off the ranch.
User avatar
By Ryan
#494748
This is not a complete thought?

For the record the Tea Party was about ejecting leftist and progressive ideology. Basically a movement to eject any politician that is positioned to the left of main stream conservatism on the political spectrum... starting from around John McCain and left. So basically (according to you), leaving behind all the racists in America, and a couple token uncle Tom conservatives, or as we refer to them, conservatives brothas...you know Herman Cain, Tim Scott and advocates like Niger Innis, Thomas Sowell and Frederick Douglass..


TP was about ejecting certain politicians on the spectrum, starting with McCain, moving left and leaving behind (what you refer to as) racists and some black conservatives...idiot
User avatar
By Phaedrus
#494752
Stinky Pete wrote:It's not a grammar criticism. You started a thought and didn't finish. Idiot.



Completing his thought, he was trying to point out that some of his best friends might be black, if they were his friends.

He was on stronger ground trying to get us to read a book by a guy calling Obama's father a goat herder.