Phaedrus wrote:You need to do some research. This story is well-covered. The only question being raised, as Barr said, is whether it was "adequately predicated." All of what we know so far is the investigation followed the rules. What the Trumpites are hanging their hopes on is that there is some smoking gun that shows the investigation was begun for the purpose of bringing Trump down and not to investigate potential ties to the FACT of Russian interference in the election.
What is a joke is the Trumpite echo chamber that believes and promulgates all of his silly little tweets. Barr deliberately makes accusations of spying so Trump can subsequently inflame his base even while Barr walks back his comment. That's how the game is played and people who care not a whit for evidence jump right in.
For over two years democrats and their media echoed the Trump-Russia collusion BS to inflame THEIR lunatic base. Talk about your echo chambers.
And for two years, dimwitted liberals kept thinking, We got him now.
And now, the verdict is in: No Collusion, No Obstruction.
What it must be like to get up everyday, look in the mirror and have to lie to yourself to make your word a little brighter.